|
|
Comparative Efficacy of Calcipotriol Ointment and Betamethasone 17-Valerate Ointment in the Treatment of Lichen Amyloidosus: A Prospective, Double-Blind, Right-Left Comparison Pilot Study
BULLETIN FOR MEDICAL PRACTITIONERS
Dr Khoo Boo Peng, Registrar
Dr Tay Yong Kwang, Consultant Dermatologist
Assoc Prof Goh Chee Leok, Senior Consultant Dermatologist, Medical Director
National Skin Centm
Introduction
Lichen amyloidosus (LA) is a persistent, pruritic eruption of multiple discreet hyperkeratotic and hyperpigmented papules, which often coalesce to form plaques, frequently distributed over the shins and extensor aspect of the arms. The aetiology remains unknown although there is evidence to suggest that it involves the degradation of cytokeratin filaments.[1]
LA is common among the Chinese.[2,3] In Singapore, a study of 142 biopsy-confirmed patients seen between 1966 and 1969 noted a higher proportion of Chinese than 4 other ethnic groups.[4] Thirty five percent of 40 patients showed clinical improvement with topical betamethasone used under occlusion within 8 weeks, but a third relapsed just as fast on cessation of treatment. [5] Other treatment modalities which have been described include laser ablation, dermabrasion, topical dimethyl sulphoxide, oral etretinate and phototherapy but the results are frequently unsatisfactory.
Calcipotriol ointment, a vitamin D analogue, is now an established mode of treatment for hyperkeratotic and hyperproliferative skin disorders such as psoriasis. It is also reported effective in disorders of cornification such as the various congenital ichthyoses.[6] The aim of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of calcipotriol on LA in comparison with betamethasone 17-valerate.
Materials and Methods
The study was designed as a prospective, doubleblind, right/left comparative pilot study of calcipotriol ointment (50ug/g) and betamethasone 17-valerate (0.1%) ointment, both applied twice daily. This was conducted in a tertiary skin referral centre in Singapore and consecutive patients with LA were recruited over a 3-month period. After a washout period of 2 weeks, the patients were given double-blind treatment of calcipotriol ointment to one affected limb and betamethasone 17-valerate ointment to the contralateral affected limb for a total of 12 weeks. All patients had symmetrical lesions and were at least 18 years of age. Excluded were patients who were pregnant or lactating, patients with known contact allergy to either calcipotriol or topical steroid, patients with hypercalcemia, and those with significant hepatic or renal disease. Written consent was obtained from all patients.
Thirty grams of each ointment was dispensed per 4-weekly visit. Patients were instructed to apply twice daily to each affected limbs using the ipsilateral hand respectively in order to avoid cross contamination.
Patients were assessed at weeks 0, 4, 8 and 12 for the right and left limbs. The extent of the lesions were assessed by the same physician with respect to:
- roughness (visual analog scale of 1 to 10,1 being the least rough and 10 being the most rough),
- hyperpigmentation (visual analog scale of 1 to 10,1 being the least hyperpigmented and 10 being the most hyperpigmented),
- any side effects.
The lesions were also similarly assessed by the patient with respect to:
- roughness,
- hyperpigmentation.
- pruritus (visual analog scale of 1 to 10,1 being the least pruritic and 10 being the most pruritic) and
- any side effects.
Clinical photographs were taken during each review. Any score differences observed between week 0 and week 12 within each treatment group were analyzed by Wilcoxon Signed Ranks test for statistical significance, while differences in scores between the 2 treatment groups were analyzed by Mann Whiteney U test.
Results
Sixteen patients (6 males ano 10 females) were recruited for the study, of which 13 were Chinese and 3 were of other ethnic groups. Their age ranged from 41 to 74 years, with a mean age of 52 +- 9.5 years.
The mean roughness score is defined as the average sum of the roughness score of all 16 patients for each treated side. Likewise the mean hyperpigmentation score and the mean pruritus score are defined as the average sum of hyperpigmentation and the average sum of pruritus respectively.


Fig.3A A patient with lichen amyloidosis involving the legs at week 0
(calcipotriol side=patient's left,
betamethasone side=patient's right) |

Fig.3B At week 12, both sides had similar degree of improvement. |
In the physician's assessment, the mean roughness scores at week 0 were 6.2 +- 2.7 for the calcipotriol side and 6.3 +- 2.9 for the betamethasone side. The mean hyperpigmentation scores at week 0 were 6.8 +- 1.8 for the calcipotriol side and 6.9 +- 1.8 for the betamethasone side (Fig 1 and 2). At the end of week 12, both sides had significantly reduced hyperpigmentation but only the calcipotriol side experienced significant reduction in roughness (Table 1 and Fig 3). However, there were no statistically significant differences between calcipotriol and betamethasone for all the weeks with regards to both treatment responses.


The patient's assessment of roughness, hyperpigmenatation and pruritus were favourable for both treated sides at the end of week 12 compared to week 0 (Table 2). However again there was no statistical significance between calcipotriol and betamethasone in treatment responses.
In the assessment of adverse events, 3 patients experienced mild degree of redness and scaling of which 1 patient had an additional complaint of itch with calcipotriol ointment. These side effects were mild and all managed to continue with the study. None of the patients experienced any adverse effects with betamethasone ointment.
Discussion
This pilot study demonstrates that the effect of twice daily application of calcipotriol ointment was equally effective as betamethasone 17-valerate ointment. Betamethasone was chosen as a control drug as it is a familiar, well-tolerated potent corticosteroid and is very frequently prescribed as an empirical treatment for lichen amyloidosus.
The reduction in roughness and hyperpigmentation imply that calcipotriol inhibits the epidermal proliferation and hyperkeratosis, as in psoriasis. Although the reduction in roughness, hyperpigmentation and pruritus are statistically significant, the magnitude of change is small and therefore may not be apparent clinically.
Lichen amyloidosus is often compounded by the problem of chronic, habitual scratching and is believed to be a form of lichen simplex chronicus.[7] The mild redness and scaling noted with calcipotriol in 3 patients may actually lead to further scratching and aggravation of the lesions. In contrast, betamethasone does not give rise to irritation.
Other treatment modalities have been tried with variable results. Destructive therapy with carbon dioxide laser[8] and dermabrasion[9] have been reported in small series. Topical dimethyl suiphoxide (DMSO) showed positive results in some patients[10] but not in others.[1 1-13] Systemic therapy with etreti nate seems to benefit some patients,[14,15] but its long-term use and its side effects is a major drawback. An anecdotal report commented on the benefit of using ultraviolet B light (UVB) which reduces pruritus in lichen amyloidosus[16] but no further work has been done thus far.
Since betamethasone 1 7-valerate ointment costs 8 times less than calcipotriol ointment, topical betamethasone remain the safest, simplest and most cost effective treatment option todate.
Conclusion
Calcipotriol ointment and betamethasonel 7-valerate ointment are equally effective in the treatment of lichen amyloidosus. In view of potential irritation and higher cost with calcipotriol ointment, the present standard treatment with topical betamethasone will likely remain until further work sheds light on this little known condition.
Acknowledgement
We would like to thank Dr Chan Yiong Huak from Clinical Trials and Epidemiology Research Unit (Singapore) for his kind assistance in the statistical analysis.
References
- Huilgol SC, Ramnarain M, Carrington P, Leigh IM, Black MM. Cytokeratins in primary cutaneous amyloidosis. Australas J Dermatol 1998;39:81-5.
- Bing SQ, Chang LL, kang LL et al. Primary cutaneou~ amyloidosis. Chinese Med J 1983;96: 185-200.
- Wong CK. Lichen amyloidosus: A relatively common disorde, in Taiwan. Arch Dermatol 1914:110:438-440.
- Leong YO, Tay CH, Fo Jet al. Lichen amyloidosus in Singapore. lntJ Dermatol. 1971;1O:156-158.
- Tay CH, Dacosta JL. Lichen amyloidosis: clinical study of 40 cases. Br J Dermatol 1970;B2. 129-36.
- Kragballe K, SteijIen PM, Ibsen HH et al. Efficacy tolerability and safety ofcalcipotriol ointment in disorders ofkeratinization. result ota randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled, rightt left comparative study Arch Dermatol 1995; 131:556-560.
- Weyers W Weyers I, Bonczkowitz M, Diaz Cascojo C, Shill WB. Lichen amyloidosus: a consequence of scratching. JAm Acad Dermatol 1997;37:923-&
- Truhan AP Garden JM, Roenigk HH. Nodular primary localized cutaneous amyloidosis: immunohistochemical evaluation and treatment with carbon dioxide laser J Am Acad Dermatol 1986:14:1058-1062.
- Wong CK, Li WM. Dermabrasion for lichen amyloidosus: report of a long-term study Arch Dermatol 1982:118:302-304.
- Dzkaya BE Baykal C, Kavak A. Local DMSD treatment of macular and papular amyloidosis. Hautarzt. 199748:31-37
- Kobayashi T Yamasaki y Watanabe T et al. Extensive lichen amyloidosus refractory to DMSD. J Dermatol 1995;22:755-75&
- Bonnetblanc JM, Catanzano G, Roux j Dimethyl suiphoxide and macular amyloidosus. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 1980;60:91.
- Lim KB, Tan SH, Tan KT Lack of effect of dimethyl suiphoxide (DMSO) on amyloid deposits in lichen amyloidosis. Br J Dermatol 1989; 119:409-410.
- Marschalko M, Daroczy J, Soos 0. Etretinate for the treatment of lichen amyloidosis. Arch Dermatol 1988124:657-659.
- Helander I, Hopsu HVK. Theatment of lichen amyloidosus by etretinate. Clin Exp Dermatol 1986;1 1:574-57&
- Hudson LD. Macular amyloidosis: treatment with ultraviolet B. Cutis 1986:38:61-2
DEDICATED TO EXCELLENCE IN DERMATOLOGY
By National Skin Centre (Singapore)
Copyright (C) 1995 - National Skin Centre (Singapore)
top^
|